Inter-laboratory LC-MS/MS processes compared
The LC-MS/MS processes of individual labs have been compared

HPLC, UHPLC

Inter-laboratory LC-MS/MS processes compared

11 Oct, 2011

Published over 14 years ago. See the latest and most current information on HPLC, UHPLC.

Scientists have used quantitative analysis processes to determine the comparability of in-house liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods.

In a study undertaken by British American Tobacco Group Research and Development, and published in BMC Research Notes, scientists noted that biomarkers have been used extensively in clinical studies to assess toxicant exposure in smokers and non-smokers, as well as evaluate novel tobacco products.

However, the laboratories involved all used in-house LC-MS/MS processes, so the team sought to determine to what extent their findings were comparable.

Each laboratory used their in-house LC-MS/MS method and a common internal standard.

The team found that repeatability and reproducibility variations, findings within laboratories were lower in inter-laboratory studies than between-laboratory studies, with an inter-laboratory variation of 12.2 per cent.

However, the scientists determined that this inter-laboratory comparison illustrated a fairly clear consensus between laboratories, although more work is needed to reduce consistent measurement biases.

Latest News

Explore Our Other Sites

Labmate Online
Green analytical chemistry review calls for integrated sustainability metrics and AI to improve pharmaceutical analysis
Explore more Arrow
Envirotech Online
England's rivers and lakes: what the 2025 data really shows about pollution drivers
Explore more Arrow
Pollution Solutions Online
Leading UK biogas operator places first orders for new FlowSep technology
Explore more Arrow
Petro Online
EU E20 plans could create a new testing workload for fuel laboratories
Explore more Arrow