Inter-laboratory LC-MS/MS processes compared
The LC-MS/MS processes of individual labs have been compared

HPLC, UHPLC

Inter-laboratory LC-MS/MS processes compared

11 Oct, 2011

Published over 14 years ago. See the latest and most current information on HPLC, UHPLC.

Scientists have used quantitative analysis processes to determine the comparability of in-house liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods.

In a study undertaken by British American Tobacco Group Research and Development, and published in BMC Research Notes, scientists noted that biomarkers have been used extensively in clinical studies to assess toxicant exposure in smokers and non-smokers, as well as evaluate novel tobacco products.

However, the laboratories involved all used in-house LC-MS/MS processes, so the team sought to determine to what extent their findings were comparable.

Each laboratory used their in-house LC-MS/MS method and a common internal standard.

The team found that repeatability and reproducibility variations, findings within laboratories were lower in inter-laboratory studies than between-laboratory studies, with an inter-laboratory variation of 12.2 per cent.

However, the scientists determined that this inter-laboratory comparison illustrated a fairly clear consensus between laboratories, although more work is needed to reduce consistent measurement biases.

Latest News

Explore Our Other Sites

Labmate Online
PrimeLab 2.0 & LabCOM® - More than 140 water parameters with free-of-charge Cloud Service
Explore more Arrow
Envirotech Online
The next leap in water quality depends on collaboration
Explore more Arrow
Pollution Solutions Online
Energy efficiency first: Why shipping must act now while low-GHG fuels scale
Explore more Arrow
Petro Online
Digitalisation advances at a large petrochemical complex in China
Explore more Arrow