Inter-laboratory LC-MS/MS processes compared
The LC-MS/MS processes of individual labs have been compared

HPLC, UHPLC

Inter-laboratory LC-MS/MS processes compared

11 Oct, 2011

Published over 14 years ago. See the latest and most current information on HPLC, UHPLC.

Scientists have used quantitative analysis processes to determine the comparability of in-house liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods.

In a study undertaken by British American Tobacco Group Research and Development, and published in BMC Research Notes, scientists noted that biomarkers have been used extensively in clinical studies to assess toxicant exposure in smokers and non-smokers, as well as evaluate novel tobacco products.

However, the laboratories involved all used in-house LC-MS/MS processes, so the team sought to determine to what extent their findings were comparable.

Each laboratory used their in-house LC-MS/MS method and a common internal standard.

The team found that repeatability and reproducibility variations, findings within laboratories were lower in inter-laboratory studies than between-laboratory studies, with an inter-laboratory variation of 12.2 per cent.

However, the scientists determined that this inter-laboratory comparison illustrated a fairly clear consensus between laboratories, although more work is needed to reduce consistent measurement biases.

Latest News

Explore Our Other Sites

Labmate Online
Mayo Clinic and Thermo Fisher Scientific launch Precure LLC to identify signs of disease before their symptoms appear
Explore more Arrow
Envirotech Online
Connected safety technology company announces CEO appointment and leadership transition
Explore more Arrow
Pollution Solutions Online
Smarter wastewater management helps futureproof distillery operations and protect local watercourses
Explore more Arrow
Petro Online
Improving repeatability in diesel fuel lubricity testing
Explore more Arrow