Rapid Determination of Strawberry Flavour Integrity using Static Headspace-Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry

Jun 12 2019

Author: Kalib J.M. Bell, Vaughan S. Langford on behalf of Syft Technologies Ltd

Free to read

This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.


Automated, direct headspace analysis using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) provides rapid and economic screening of flavour mixes. By coupling the SIFT-MS analysis with multivariate statistical analysis, rapid determination of ingredient flavour quality can be achieved without needing to resort to expert data interpretation. In this paper, classification of different batches of various strawberry flavour mix types of unknown, proprietory compositions is achieved with analysis times of less than one minute per sample. This approach has quality control applications for the food industry.

Unintended use of an out-of-specification flavour mix in foods, beverages or nutritional formulations can lead to reduced consumer confidence and product losses. However, traditional screening using a trained sensory panel is expensive. Viable instrumental alternatives for determining acceptance are few due to various practical limitations:
• The gold-standard VOC analysis methods - gas chromatography (GC), gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O), and liquid chromatography (LC) - are slow and can struggle with the diversity of compounds in flavours. They also require significant sample preparation, including derivatisation for the short-chain aldehydes and organic acids.
• Electronic noses are subject to significant drift, susceptible to contamination and false positive readings (e.g. from ethanol residues), and cannot identify individual flavour components.
• Traditional direct mass spectrometric (DMS) methods are too harsh or not selective enough to give unique spectral fingerprints.
Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS), on the other hand, is a direct mass spectrometry (DMS) technique that eliminates chromatography and applies very soft chemical ionisation. In doing so, SIFT-MS can selectively fingerprint samples of proprietory composition – without identification of flavour compounds – in less than one minute.
Recently, rapid geographical classification of Mediterranean olive oils [1] and Moroccan Argan oils [2] has been achieved using untargeted SIFT-MS analysis combined with multivariate statistical analysis. In this paper, a similar approach is applied to classify various commercial strawberry flavour mixes for intra-mix (i.e. batch) and inter-mix variations.

1. The SIFT-MS technique
SIFT-MS [3,4,5] uses soft chemical ionisation (CI) to rapidly quantify VOCs to low parts-per-trillion concentrations (by volume, pptV). The SIFT-MS technique is represented schematically in Figure 1. Eight individually selectable reagent ions (H3O+, NO+, O2+, O-, OH-, O2-, NO2- and NO3-) are generated in a microwave discharge through moist or dry air. These eight reagent ions react with VOCs and other trace analytes in well-controlled ion-molecule reactions, but they do not react with the major components of air (N2, O2 and Ar). This enables real-time analysis of air samples at trace and ultra-trace levels without pre-concentration, and results compare well with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [6].
Rapid switching between reagent ions provides high selectivity, because the multiple reaction mechanisms can provide additional independent measurements of each analyte. The multiple reagent ions also help to remove uncertainty from isobaric overlaps in mixtures containing multiple analytes.
In this study, full mass scan analyses (SCAN) were carried out using a Voice200ultra SIFT-MS instrument (Syft Technologies, Christchurch, New Zealand). Only the NO+ reagent ion was utilised due to this ion being the least affected by the relatively high ethanol residues in the flavour mixes  (the rate coefficient for reaction of NO+ with ethanol is somewhat slower than H3O+ and O2+).
The NO+ reagent ion also has two other significant benefits for flavour analysis:

•NO+ reacts via multiple reaction mechanisms (association, hydride abstraction, electron transfer (ET) and dissociative ET), the relevance of which depends on the molecule’s ionisation energy and chemical functionality. This maximises selectivity both for conventional targeted analysis and for the fingerprinting approach applied here.

• NO+ is highly immune to moisture variations.
Since the flavour mixes analysed in this study are proprietory formulations, identities of specific components in the spectra were not provided. However, Latrasse [7] reviews of compounds that are likely to be present, which include alcohols, aldehydes, esters, furanone derivatives. Table 1 provides some examples of the reaction chemistry for several compounds identified in the flavour mixes.







2. Automated SIFT-MS analysis
In SIFT-MS, direct sample analysis facilitates high-throughput headspace analysis, because the rate-limiting chromatographic analysis is eliminated. In contrast to automated chromatographic techniques, which require rapid injection to achieve good peak shapes and temporal separation, SIFT-MS requires steady sample injection for the duration of the analysis. In SIFT-MS, sample injection and analysis occur simultaneously.
Automated headspace analysis was carried out using a SIFT-MS instrument coupled with a Gerstel multi-purpose sampler (MPS; Gerstel, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany). Samples were first incubated in a Gerstel agitator prior to sampling of the headspace and subsequent injection into the SIFT-MS instrument through a Gerstel septumless sampling head. A make-up gas flow (high-purity N2) was also introduced through the sampling head, maintaining the standard sample gas flow (nominally 25 cm3 min-1) into the SIFT-MS instrument.
The Gerstel MPS2 autosampler was controlled using Gerstel’s Maestro software. In addition to controlling the injection into the SIFT-MS instrument, the Maestro software’s PrepAhead function allows for optimal scheduling of pre-injection preparation steps, such as syringe flush or incubation. This ensures that the highest sample throughput is achieved – a feature that is more important for SIFT-MS than for chromatographic methods.
3. Samples and analysis conditions
Table 2 summarises the powdered strawberry flavour samples supplied for analysis. For each flavour mix, five replicate samples (10 ± 1 mg) were weighed into 20 mL headspace vials and incubated at 50°C for 15 minutes. The headspace was sampled with a 2.5 mL headspace syringe and injected at a flow-rate of 10 µL s-1 into the SIFT-MS instrument’s inlet together with the make-up gas, giving a total flow rate of ca. 420 µL s-1. A blank was analysed between each set of replicates and subsequently subtracted from the following group. Flavour mixes and blanks were analysed in less than one minute per sample.
4. Multivariate statistical analysis
The SIFT-MS SCAN data (NO+ reagent ion only) were post-processed using multivariate statistical analysis to determine the ability of SIFT-MS to discriminate between the flavour mixes.
The multivariate statistical methodology utilised was Soft Independent Modelling by Class Analogy (SIMCA), which was developed by Wold in the 1970s [8]. SIMCA applies principal component analysis (PCA) to the whole dataset and to each of the classes with the end goal of creating a model that discriminates each class from the others. The Infometrix® Inc. (Bothell, WA) implementation of the SIMCA algorithm in the Pirouette software package was employed here.  
Prior to analysis using the Pirouette software package, SIFT-MS SCAN data were normalised (giving a sum of unity for all masses in the range), had the blank subtracted, and had masses with normalised signals less than 0.000005 removed.
Three types of output from the SIMCA analysis are presented in this report:
1. Class projections: These three-dimensional plots show how each sample falls with respect to the three most important principal components derived from PCA on the entire data set. Each user-defined class shows the sample with the same color and a ‘cloud’ representing the calculated space in which all samples of the class are expected to lie. Better class separations lead to more confident assignment of unknown samples to a predefined class, if a suitable one exists.
2. Interclass distances: These are a measure of the separation between classes. A value of three (3) is usually considered acceptable for class separation [9].  Sometimes the class separability indicated by these distances is not apparent in the three-dimensional class projection plot.
3. Discriminating power: This parameter helps variables to be identified that provide the most discrimination between the classes. A variable with larger discriminating power has greater influence on separating the classes than one with a small discriminating power. There does not appear to be a set threshold value above which a discriminating power is considered ‘good’, because these values vary strongly with interclass distance.

Results and Discussion
The SIFT-MS SCAN data (obtained using the NO+ reagent ion) for the strawberry flavour mixes are shown in Figure 2. The data in Figure 2 are the mean of the five replicate analyses, whereas the individual replicates are utilised for the subsequent statistical analyses in which these scans are utilised as ‘flavour fingerprints’.
 1. Evaluation of the ability to discriminate different batches of flavour standards
SIFT-MS scan data obtained using the NO+ reagent ion can be used to rapidly screen different flavour mix batches for acceptability. Figures 3 and 4 show the results obtained for flavour standards 1 (S1) and 2 (S2), respectively, following multivariate statistical analysis with the SIMCA algorithm. The analysis reveals that the different batches of S1 are significantly less consistent than those of S2, both visually in the class projections and quantitatively from the interclass distance metric (Figures 3 and 4).
2. Evaluation of the ability to discriminate between standards
Figure 5 shows an evaluation of the ability of SIFT-MS to discriminate between the different flavour mixes. For this statistical analysis, the three batches for each of flavour standard 1 and 2 are grouped together into their parent classes. The separation obtained is very large, confirming the visual differences observable in the scan spectra (Figure 2). Chemically, these differences arise from different compositions of the flavour mixes that then give rise to different product ion profiles in the SIFT-MS mass spectra.  The discriminating powers indicate the product ion m/z that discriminate these mixes most effectively.  For example, it appears that 4-decanolide and methyl cinnamate are significant in this instance.
3. Evaluation of ability to classify unknowns
Three unidentified flavour mixes were supplied for evaluation using SIFT-MS.  To identify the mix group to which they belong (if any), each of the ‘unknown’ samples (U1, U2, and U3) was added as a new class in the SIMCA analysis. The results obtained are summarised in Figure 6. Based on the interclass distances determined (and confirmed visually in the class projection plot):
• Unknown 1 (U1) is another batch of flavour standard 1 (S1). The interclass distance between U1 and S1 is greater than 3, but as shown in Figure 3, the three batches (identified as S1a, S1b, and S1c) are all readily differentiable based on their volatile profiles. That is, there is a lot of variability in the batches of the S1 mix.
• Unknown 2 (U2) is identified as another batch of flavour standard 2 (S2), because the interclass distance is very small.
• Unknown 3 (U3) is extremely different from all other flavour mixes, as indicated by large interclass distances with all other samples. It represents a completely different (i.e. a third) flavour mix.
Assignments of unknown samples U1 and U2 to S1 and S2, respectively, were confirmed by adding them to the S1 and S2 data sets and reprocessing with SIMCA. Further confirmation of these assignments was provided by the customer. They likewise observed significant variation in S1 batches using gas chromatographic analysis and attributed it to degradation of the flavour mixes.

This study demonstrates that untargeted SIFT-MS analysis coupled with multivariate statistical analysis can rapidly screen strawberry flavour mixes to ensure that they fall within the required specification prior to their use in foods, beverages, and nutritional formulations. Automated static headspace-SIFT-MS analyses samples in less than one minute using a fingerprinting approach (full scan mode).
The combined instrumental and statistical approach utilised here has potential to facilitate enhanced quality control through rapid, economical screening of food ingredients.

The authors thank Professor Murray McEwan and Dr Diandree Padayachee for helpful comments.
1. A. Bajoub, S. Medina-Rodriguez, A. El-Amine, L. Cuadros-Rodriguez, R. Monasterio, J. Vercammen, A. Fernandez-Gutierrez, A. Carrasco-Pancorbo, Food Res. Int. 106 (2018) 233.
2. M. Kharbach, R. Kamal, A.M. Mansouri, I. Marmouzi, J. Viane, Y. Cherrah, K. Alaoui, J. Vercammen, A. Bouklouze, Y.V. Heyden, Food Chem. 263 (2018) 8.
3. P. Spanel, D. Smith, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 24 (1996) 409.
4. D. Smith, P. Spanel, Mass Spec. Rev. 24 (2005) 661.
5. B.J. Prince, D.B. Milligan, M.J. McEwan, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 24 (2010) 1763.
6. V.S. Langford, I. Graves, M.J. McEwan, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 28 (2014) 10.
7. A. Latrasse in H. Maarse (Editor), Volatile Compounds in Foods and Beverages, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, 1991, pp. 333-340.
8. S. Wold, Pattern Recognition, 8 (1976) 127.
9. O.M. Kvalheim, T.V. Karstang in R.G. Brereton (Editor), Multivariate Pattern Recognition in Chemometrics, Illustrated by Case Studies, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, p. 237.


Free to read

This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.


Digital Edition

Chromatography Today - Buyers' Guide 2022

October 2023

In This Edition Modern & Practical Applications - Accelerating ADC Development with Mass Spectrometry - Implementing High-Resolution Ion Mobility into Peptide Mapping Workflows Chromatogr...

View all digital editions


Korea Lab 2024

Apr 23 2024 Kintex, South Korea

Korea Chem 2024

Apr 23 2024 Seoul, South Korea

AOCS Annual Meeting & Expo

Apr 28 2024 Montreal, Quebec, Canada

SETAC Europe

May 05 2024 Seville, Spain

ChemUK 2024

May 15 2024 Birmingham, UK

View all events